Relation of PTA and SRT (Pure Tone Average - Speech Recognition Threshold)
Authors:
Novák A.†; J. Vokřál; O. Dlouhá
Authors‘ workplace:
Foniatrická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha
přednostka doc. MUDr. O. Dlouhá, CSc.
Published in:
Otorinolaryngol Foniatr, 57, 2008, No. 4, pp. 201-205.
Category:
Original Article
Overview
The aim of our study
is the comparison of examinational process for determination of parameters, which are being used by the evaluation of speech recognition, by the help of speech audiometry. We have asked ourselves the question whether there is a dependency between PTA and SRT, if we use for determination SRT a test of Czech speech audiometry. We have used the results of 34 patients suffering sensorineural hearing loss. The determination of SRT6 from our results is the most profitable. It is clear from our study that the relationship between PTA and SRT is possible.
Key words:
PTA (pure tone average), SRT (speech recognition threshold), sensorineural hearing loss.
Sources
1. ASHA: Guidelines for determination threshold level for speech. ASHA, 30, 1988, s. 85-89.
2. Beattie, R. C., Forrester, P. W., & Ruby, B. K: Reliability of the Tillman-Olsen procedure for determination of spondee threshold using recorded and live voice presentation. J. Am. Audiol. Soc., 2, 1976, s. 159 162.
3. Berlin, C. I., Wexler, K. F., Jerger, J. F., Halperin, H. R., Smith, S.: Superior ultra - audiometric hearing. A new type of hearing loos which correlates highly with unusually good speech in the “profoundly deaf.” Otolaryngol., 86, 1978, s. 111-116.
4. Carhart, R.: Observations on relations between thresholds for pure tones and for speech. J. Speech Hear Dis., 36, 1971, s. 476-483.
5. Čermák, F., Křen, M.: Frekvenční slovník češtiny. Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, 2004. ISBN 80-7106-676-1.
6. Egan, J. P.: Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope, 58, 1948, s. 955-991.
7. Fletcher, H. A.: A method for calculating loss for speech from an audiogram. Acta Otolaryngol, Suppl., 90, 1950, s. 26-37.
8. Fletcher, H. A, Steinberg, J. C a spol.: Articulation testing methods. Bell. Tel. Syst. Tech. Public., 8, 1929, s. 806-854.
9. Fletcher, H. A.: Speech and hearing. Priceton, New Jersey. Van Norstrand Reinhold, 1929.
10. Fowler, E. P.: A simple method of measuring method percentage of capacity to hear speech. Arch. Otolaryngol, 36, 1942, s. 874-890.
11. Hirsch, I., Davis, H., Silverman, S., Reynolds, E., Eldbert, E. & Benson, R.: Development of materials for speech audiometry. J. Speech and Hear Dis., 1952, 17, s. 321-337.
12. Hudgins, C., Hawkins, J., Karlin, J. & Stevens, S.: The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope, 57, 1947, s. 57-89.
13. Chaiklin, J. B., Font, J., Dixon, R. F.: Spondaic thresholds measured in ascending steps. J. Speech Hear Res., 10, 1967, s. 141-148.
14. Chaiklin, J. B., Ventry, I. M.: Spondee threshold measurement: A comparison of 2- and 5-dB methods. J. Speech and Hear Dis.. 29, 1964, s. 59.
15. Owens, E., Schubert, E. D.: Development of the California Consonant Test. J. Speech Hear Res., 20, 1977, s. 463-474.
16. Roeser, R. J.: Roeseręs audiology Desk reference. A guide to the practice of audiology. Thieme, New York – Stuttgart, 1996, 398 s.
17. Seeman, M. a spol.: Česká slovní audiometrie. SZN, Praha, 1960, 146 s.
18. Tillman, T. V., Carhart, R.: An expanded test for speech Discrimination utilizing CNC, monosyllabic words (Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6), Technical Report, SAM-TDR-66-55. USAF of School Aerospace Medicine, Aerospace Medical Division (AFSC), Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, 1966.
19. Tillman, T. W., Olsen, W. O.: Speech audiometry. In Jerger, J. (Ed.): Modern development in audiology. New York, Academic Press, 1973, s. 37-74.
20. Ventry. M., Chailkin, J. B.: Multidiscipline study of functional hearing loos. J. Aud. Res., 3, 1965, s. 175-272.
21. Wall, L. G., Davis, L. A., Myers, D. K.: Four spondee threshold procedure. A comparison. Ear Hear, 5, 1984, s. 171-174.
22. Wilson, R., Morgan, D., Dirks, D.: A proposed SRT procedure its statistical precedent. J. Speech and Hear Dis., 38, 1973, s. 184-191.
23. Young, L. L., Dudley, B, Gunter, M. B.: Thresholds and psychometric functions of individual spondaic words. J. Speech Hear Res., 25, 1982, s. 586-590.
Labels
Audiology Paediatric ENT ENT (Otorhinolaryngology)Article was published in
Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics
2008 Issue 4
Most read in this issue
- Vestibular Schwannoma
- Pemphigus Vulgaris
- Relation of PTA and SRT (Pure Tone Average - Speech Recognition Threshold)
- Primary Squamous-Epithelial Carcinoma